Aggregated team performance data including expected goals, shots, possession, corners, and discipline stats.
| Team | League | MP | Goals | Avg xG | Shots/G | Poss% | Corners/G | Cards/G |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Urawa Reds | FIFA Intercontinental Cup | 3 | 3 | — | 7.3 | 40% | 5 | 1 |
| Al Ahly | FIFA Intercontinental Cup | 12 | 22 | — | 14.8 | 50% | 5 | 2.2 |
Expected Goals (xG) is the single most important advanced metric in modern football analytics. It measures the quality of scoring chances by assigning each shot a probability of being scored, based on factors like distance, angle, assist type, and whether it was a header. A penalty is worth about 0.76 xG, while a long-range shot might be just 0.03.
The Avg xG column shows how many goals a team is expected to score per match based on their shot quality. Teams with high xG but lower actual goals are likely due a positive regression — they are creating chances but not converting them yet. The reverse (low xG, high goals) suggests a team overperforming that may regress. Read our detailed xG explainer for a deeper dive.
Shots per game indicates offensive intent — teams averaging 15+ shots are creating volume. But shots alone do not tell you about quality, which is why xG is the more reliable predictor. A team with 10 shots and 1.8 xG is more dangerous than one with 16 shots and 1.2 xG.
Possession (highlighted green above 55%) reflects control but not necessarily dominance. Some of Europe's best counter-attacking teams thrive on low possession. For betting, possession is most useful in predicting corner counts (high-possession teams win more) and tempo (high-possession games tend to be lower scoring).
The Cards/G column tracks total cards per match per team. This is useful for the cards/bookings market, which some bookmakers offer as over/under on total cards or total booking points. Teams with aggressive pressing styles or those frequently defending deep tend to commit more fouls and receive more cards. Cross-reference with form — teams on losing streaks often accumulate more cards from frustrated tackles. Check our corner data alongside cards, as set-piece-heavy teams with high card counts create chaotic matches ideal for Over bets.
| Auckland City | FIFA Intercontinental Cup | 4 | 2 | — | 4.5 | 36% | 4 | 0.8 |
| Flamengo | FIFA Intercontinental Cup | 5 | 11 | — | 11.4 | 50% | 2.8 | 3.6 |
| Real Madrid | FIFA Intercontinental Cup | 3 | 12 | — | 16 | 63% | 5.3 | 0.3 |
| Al Jazira | FIFA Intercontinental Cup | 3 | 6 | — | 12.3 | 56% | 4.7 | 1.7 |
| Al Hilal | FIFA Intercontinental Cup | 6 | 13 | — | 11.5 | 46% | 3.8 | 2.3 |
| Pachuca | FIFA Intercontinental Cup | 3 | 3 | — | 12.7 | 39% | 3 | 3 |
| Pyramids FC | FIFA Intercontinental Cup | 3 | 6 | — | 15.7 | 55% | 4 | 1.7 |