Aggregated team performance data including expected goals, shots, possession, corners, and discipline stats.
| Team | League | MP | Goals | Avg xG | Shots/G | Poss% | Corners/G | Cards/G |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gençlerbirliği | 1. Lig | 109 | 143 | 0 | 12.8 | 48% | 4.7 | 2.3 |
| Hatayspor | 1. Lig | 34 | 23 | 0 | 8 | 47% | 3.3 | 3 |
Expected Goals (xG) is the single most important advanced metric in modern football analytics. It measures the quality of scoring chances by assigning each shot a probability of being scored, based on factors like distance, angle, assist type, and whether it was a header. A penalty is worth about 0.76 xG, while a long-range shot might be just 0.03.
The Avg xG column shows how many goals a team is expected to score per match based on their shot quality. Teams with high xG but lower actual goals are likely due a positive regression — they are creating chances but not converting them yet. The reverse (low xG, high goals) suggests a team overperforming that may regress. Read our detailed xG explainer for a deeper dive.
Shots per game indicates offensive intent — teams averaging 15+ shots are creating volume. But shots alone do not tell you about quality, which is why xG is the more reliable predictor. A team with 10 shots and 1.8 xG is more dangerous than one with 16 shots and 1.2 xG.
Possession (highlighted green above 55%) reflects control but not necessarily dominance. Some of Europe's best counter-attacking teams thrive on low possession. For betting, possession is most useful in predicting corner counts (high-possession teams win more) and tempo (high-possession games tend to be lower scoring).
The Cards/G column tracks total cards per match per team. This is useful for the cards/bookings market, which some bookmakers offer as over/under on total cards or total booking points. Teams with aggressive pressing styles or those frequently defending deep tend to commit more fouls and receive more cards. Cross-reference with form — teams on losing streaks often accumulate more cards from frustrated tackles. Check our corner data alongside cards, as set-piece-heavy teams with high card counts create chaotic matches ideal for Over bets.
| Boluspor | 1. Lig | 178 | 231 | 0 | 12 | 52% | 4.5 | 2.3 |
| Eskişehirspor | 1. Lig | 34 | 23 | — | 9.1 | 42% | 3.8 | 2.6 |
| Şanlıurfaspor | 1. Lig | 72 | 77 | — | 11 | 47% | 4.4 | 1.9 |
| Sincan Belediyesi Ankaraspor | 1. Lig | 34 | 34 | — | 9.6 | 47% | 3.6 | 2.6 |
| Ümraniyespor | 1. Lig | 181 | 246 | — | 11.5 | 51% | 4.2 | 2.4 |
| Adana Demirspor | 1. Lig | 65 | 80 | — | 10.8 | 46% | 3.7 | 1.7 |
| Bursaspor | 1. Lig | 70 | 99 | — | 13.2 | 51% | 5 | 2.2 |
| Bandırmaspor | 1. Lig | 180 | 259 | — | 12.2 | 50% | 4.9 | 2.3 |
| Akhisar Belediyespor | 1. Lig | 34 | 36 | — | 10.8 | 48% | 3.7 | 2.6 |
| Samsunspor | 1. Lig | 74 | 112 | — | 15.2 | 53% | 5.8 | 2.5 |
| İstanbulspor | 1. Lig | 145 | 230 | — | 12.5 | 53% | 4.4 | 1.9 |
| Eyüpspor | 1. Lig | 72 | 134 | — | 15.1 | 58% | 5.6 | 1.9 |
| Balıkesirspor | 1. Lig | 70 | 61 | — | 9.4 | 43% | 3.5 | 2.4 |
| Menemen FK | 1. Lig | 70 | 83 | — | 10.3 | 45% | 3.4 | 2.5 |
| Ankaragücü | 1. Lig | 74 | 105 | — | 13.6 | 53% | 4.9 | 2 |
| Amed SK | 1. Lig | 69 | 108 | — | 14 | 54% | 5.2 | 2.5 |
| Manisa FK | 1. Lig | 141 | 184 | — | 12.1 | 52% | 4.5 | 2.6 |
| Sarıyer SK | 1. Lig | 31 | 34 | — | 11.6 | 49% | 4.5 | 2.7 |
| Göztepe | 1. Lig | 35 | 61 | — | 15.7 | 52% | 4.1 | 1.9 |
| Altınordu | 1. Lig | 73 | 107 | — | 11.5 | 46% | 4.4 | 2.5 |
| Fatih Karagümrük | 1. Lig | 39 | 58 | — | 11 | 50% | 4.5 | 2.5 |
| Altay | 1. Lig | 71 | 87 | — | 10.5 | 50% | 4.1 | 2.3 |
| Tuzlaspor | 1. Lig | 104 | 126 | — | 10.3 | 50% | 3.6 | 2.4 |
| Sakaryaspor | 1. Lig | 106 | 143 | — | 11.3 | 50% | 4.5 | 2.6 |
| Adanaspor | 1. Lig | 142 | 141 | — | 10.1 | 47% | 3.9 | 2.5 |
| Keçiörengücü | 1. Lig | 175 | 244 | — | 12.3 | 50% | 4.8 | 2.3 |
| Giresunspor | 1. Lig | 68 | 68 | — | 10.3 | 44% | 3.8 | 2.1 |
| Yeni Malatyaspor | 1. Lig | 38 | 14 | — | 4.7 | 34% | 1.3 | 2.1 |
| Erzurumspor FK | 1. Lig | 152 | 230 | — | 11.8 | 50% | 4.6 | 2.3 |
| Pendikspor | 1. Lig | 69 | 94 | — | 12.4 | 52% | 4.9 | 2.8 |
| Vanspor FK | 1. Lig | 31 | 42 | — | 10.8 | 54% | 3.9 | 2.6 |
| Kocaelispor | 1. Lig | 109 | 157 | — | 13.2 | 52% | 4.6 | 2.5 |
| Çorum FK | 1. Lig | 106 | 158 | — | 12.2 | 55% | 5.4 | 2.5 |
| Bodrum FK | 1. Lig | 69 | 115 | — | 12.3 | 49% | 4.9 | 2.2 |
| Esenler Erokspor | 1. Lig | 69 | 126 | — | 11.8 | 54% | 4.6 | 2.2 |
| Serik Belediyespor | 1. Lig | 31 | 36 | — | 10 | 40% | 3.3 | 2.5 |
| Iğdır FK | 1. Lig | 69 | 97 | — | 11.8 | 58% | 5.6 | 2.5 |
| Denizlispor | 1. Lig | 36 | 46 | — | 10.4 | 47% | 4.5 | 2.8 |
| Sivasspor | 1. Lig | 33 | 40 | — | 11.7 | 51% | 4.5 | 2.4 |