Aggregated team performance data including expected goals, shots, possession, corners, and discipline stats.
| Team | League | MP | Goals | Avg xG | Shots/G | Poss% | Corners/G | Cards/G |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Juventude | Copa do Brasil | 5 | 12 | — | 17 | 52% | 7.8 | 2 |
| Corinthians | Copa do Brasil | 12 | 14 | — | 11 | 53% | 4.4 | 3.2 |
Expected Goals (xG) is the single most important advanced metric in modern football analytics. It measures the quality of scoring chances by assigning each shot a probability of being scored, based on factors like distance, angle, assist type, and whether it was a header. A penalty is worth about 0.76 xG, while a long-range shot might be just 0.03.
The Avg xG column shows how many goals a team is expected to score per match based on their shot quality. Teams with high xG but lower actual goals are likely due a positive regression — they are creating chances but not converting them yet. The reverse (low xG, high goals) suggests a team overperforming that may regress. Read our detailed xG explainer for a deeper dive.
Shots per game indicates offensive intent — teams averaging 15+ shots are creating volume. But shots alone do not tell you about quality, which is why xG is the more reliable predictor. A team with 10 shots and 1.8 xG is more dangerous than one with 16 shots and 1.2 xG.
Possession (highlighted green above 55%) reflects control but not necessarily dominance. Some of Europe's best counter-attacking teams thrive on low possession. For betting, possession is most useful in predicting corner counts (high-possession teams win more) and tempo (high-possession games tend to be lower scoring).
The Cards/G column tracks total cards per match per team. This is useful for the cards/bookings market, which some bookmakers offer as over/under on total cards or total booking points. Teams with aggressive pressing styles or those frequently defending deep tend to commit more fouls and receive more cards. Cross-reference with form — teams on losing streaks often accumulate more cards from frustrated tackles. Check our corner data alongside cards, as set-piece-heavy teams with high card counts create chaotic matches ideal for Over bets.
| Bahia | Copa do Brasil | 8 | 11 | — | 12.5 | 61% | 7 | 2.4 |
| Vasco da Gama | Copa do Brasil | 12 | 14 | — | 15.4 | 55% | 5.1 | 2.3 |
| Flamengo | Copa do Brasil | 6 | 8 | — | 21.2 | 67% | 6.8 | 1.3 |
| Fluminense | Copa do Brasil | 10 | 14 | — | 12.9 | 50% | 4.9 | 2.3 |
| Sport Recife | Copa do Brasil | 3 | 2 | — | 14 | 62% | 8.3 | 2 |
| Internacional | Copa do Brasil | 6 | 11 | — | 18.8 | 62% | 6.3 | 2.3 |
| Botafogo | Copa do Brasil | 8 | 10 | — | 15.8 | 59% | 6.5 | 2 |
| Grêmio | Copa do Brasil | 4 | 7 | — | 17.3 | 61% | 7.3 | 2.5 |
| Cruzeiro | Copa do Brasil | 10 | 16 | — | 14.8 | 50% | 7.9 | 2.5 |
| Palmeiras | Copa do Brasil | 6 | 11 | — | 19.7 | 58% | 7.8 | 2 |
| Atlético Mineiro | Copa do Brasil | 8 | 10 | — | 15.4 | 55% | 6.1 | 2.4 |
| Athletico PR | Copa do Brasil | 8 | 3 | — | 12.4 | 50% | 4.5 | 2.6 |
| Paysandu | Copa do Brasil | 6 | 8 | — | 13.8 | 45% | 5 | 1.7 |
| São Paulo | Copa do Brasil | 6 | 8 | — | 12 | 51% | 6.5 | 2.2 |
| Fortaleza | Copa do Brasil | 7 | 10 | — | 15.1 | 54% | 7.6 | 3.3 |
| Santos | Copa do Brasil | 4 | 3 | — | 13.5 | 50% | 8.3 | 3.3 |
| CSA | Copa do Brasil | 5 | 4 | — | 9.4 | 36% | 2.8 | 2.6 |
| Madureira | Copa do Brasil | 3 | 4 | — | 13 | 56% | 3.7 | 2.3 |
| CRB | Copa do Brasil | 9 | 11 | — | 13.8 | 51% | 6.2 | 2.7 |
| São Bernardo | Copa do Brasil | 3 | 3 | — | 10 | 56% | 4.7 | 2.3 |
| Novorizontino | Copa do Brasil | 5 | 7 | — | 12.6 | 53% | 6 | 1.6 |
| Botafogo PB | Copa do Brasil | 3 | 3 | — | 10 | 34% | 4 | 1.7 |
| Bragantino | Copa do Brasil | 6 | 8 | — | 13.8 | 56% | 4.5 | 2.5 |
| Atlético GO | Copa do Brasil | 5 | 3 | — | 12 | 52% | 3.8 | 4.4 |
| Jacuipense | Copa do Brasil | 5 | 3 | — | 7 | 40% | 3.4 | 2.8 |
| Nova Iguaçu | Copa do Brasil | 3 | 5 | — | 7 | 57% | 2.7 | 1.7 |
| Londrina | Copa do Brasil | 3 | 1 | — | 9.3 | 58% | 5.7 | 2 |
| Portuguesa | Copa do Brasil | 3 | 8 | — | 15 | 54% | 8 | 1.3 |
| Goiás | Copa do Brasil | 5 | 8 | — | 14.8 | 55% | 5.4 | 2.4 |
| Figueirense | Copa do Brasil | 3 | 2 | — | 11.3 | 49% | 4.7 | 1.7 |
| Volta Redonda | Copa do Brasil | 3 | 4 | — | 15 | 50% | 5.7 | 2.7 |
| Vila Nova | Copa do Brasil | 5 | 1 | — | 14 | 52% | 5.8 | 3.4 |
| Confiança | Copa do Brasil | 4 | 2 | — | 11.3 | 44% | 3.3 | 3.8 |
| Ceará | Copa do Brasil | 7 | 6 | — | 12.9 | 51% | 4 | 2.6 |
| Maringá | Copa do Brasil | 5 | 8 | — | 11 | 46% | 4.4 | 4.4 |
| Águia de Marabá | Copa do Brasil | 3 | 3 | — | 6.3 | 46% | 4 | 3 |
| Operário PR | Copa do Brasil | 7 | 8 | — | 12.1 | 48% | 2.9 | 3.3 |
| Maracanã | Copa do Brasil | 3 | 0 | — | 4.3 | 40% | 1.3 | 3.7 |
| Barra FC | Copa do Brasil | 4 | 0 | — | 9.3 | 42% | 2.5 | 1.3 |
| Capital Brasilia | Copa do Brasil | 4 | 2 | — | 10.8 | 42% | 4.5 | 0.5 |
| Athletic Club | Copa do Brasil | 5 | 9 | — | 9.2 | 42% | 2.8 | 2.8 |
| Retrô | Copa do Brasil | 5 | 5 | — | 12.4 | 39% | 4.8 | 2 |
| Santa Catarina | Copa do Brasil | 3 | 3 | — | 15 | 60% | 4 | 3.3 |