Aggregated team performance data including expected goals, shots, possession, corners, and discipline stats.
| Team | League | MP | Goals | Avg xG | Shots/G | Poss% | Corners/G | Cards/G |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Boreham Wood | Enterprise National League | 182 | 245 | 0 | 10.2 | 50% | 5.4 | 1.8 |
| Yeovil Town | Enterprise National League | 165 | 186 | 0 | 9.1 | 49% | 4.4 | 2.3 |
Expected Goals (xG) is the single most important advanced metric in modern football analytics. It measures the quality of scoring chances by assigning each shot a probability of being scored, based on factors like distance, angle, assist type, and whether it was a header. A penalty is worth about 0.76 xG, while a long-range shot might be just 0.03.
The Avg xG column shows how many goals a team is expected to score per match based on their shot quality. Teams with high xG but lower actual goals are likely due a positive regression — they are creating chances but not converting them yet. The reverse (low xG, high goals) suggests a team overperforming that may regress. Read our detailed xG explainer for a deeper dive.
Shots per game indicates offensive intent — teams averaging 15+ shots are creating volume. But shots alone do not tell you about quality, which is why xG is the more reliable predictor. A team with 10 shots and 1.8 xG is more dangerous than one with 16 shots and 1.2 xG.
Possession (highlighted green above 55%) reflects control but not necessarily dominance. Some of Europe's best counter-attacking teams thrive on low possession. For betting, possession is most useful in predicting corner counts (high-possession teams win more) and tempo (high-possession games tend to be lower scoring).
The Cards/G column tracks total cards per match per team. This is useful for the cards/bookings market, which some bookmakers offer as over/under on total cards or total booking points. Teams with aggressive pressing styles or those frequently defending deep tend to commit more fouls and receive more cards. Cross-reference with form — teams on losing streaks often accumulate more cards from frustrated tackles. Check our corner data alongside cards, as set-piece-heavy teams with high card counts create chaotic matches ideal for Over bets.
| Notts County | Enterprise National League | 88 | 142 | — | 11.1 | 54% | 5.5 | 1.8 |
| Ebbsfleet United | Enterprise National League | 90 | 96 | — | 9.3 | 49% | 4.9 | 2.1 |
| Scunthorpe United | Enterprise National League | 41 | 74 | — | 12.7 | 49% | 5.3 | 2 |
| Southend United | Enterprise National League | 166 | 234 | — | 12.2 | 54% | 5.7 | 1.6 |
| Salford City | Enterprise National League | 4 | 7 | — | 13 | 47% | 3.8 | 2 |
| Truro City | Enterprise National League | 37 | 34 | — | 9.3 | 44% | 4.8 | 1.7 |
| Tamworth | Enterprise National League | 84 | 115 | — | 11.6 | 41% | 5 | 2.1 |
| Forest Green Rovers | Enterprise National League | 87 | 139 | — | 13 | 53% | 5.7 | 1.8 |
| Boston United | Enterprise National League | 84 | 104 | — | 10 | 43% | 4.3 | 1.9 |
| Aldershot Town | Enterprise National League | 219 | 319 | — | 10.3 | 49% | 4.7 | 2.3 |
| Grimsby Town | Enterprise National League | 41 | 71 | — | 11.8 | 51% | 5.9 | 1.5 |
| Eastleigh | Enterprise National League | 219 | 281 | — | 8.3 | 46% | 4.1 | 2.1 |
| Oldham Athletic | Enterprise National League | 97 | 138 | — | 10.2 | 49% | 4.6 | 2.2 |
| Rochdale | Enterprise National League | 129 | 211 | — | 11.4 | 55% | 4.9 | 1.4 |
| Chesterfield | Enterprise National League | 135 | 235 | — | 11.3 | 55% | 5.9 | 2.1 |
| Stockport County | Enterprise National League | 81 | 153 | — | 11 | 54% | 7 | 1.4 |
| Wealdstone | Enterprise National League | 213 | 270 | — | 10 | 52% | 4.5 | 2.1 |
| Wrexham | Enterprise National League | 84 | 157 | — | 11.8 | 50% | 5.6 | 1.6 |
| Bromley | Enterprise National League | 130 | 201 | — | 10.1 | 46% | 5.2 | 1.7 |
| Sutton United | Enterprise National League | 138 | 205 | — | 10.6 | 51% | 5.3 | 2 |
| Hartlepool United | Enterprise National League | 179 | 247 | — | 11.4 | 50% | 5.3 | 1.8 |
| Barnet | Enterprise National League | 175 | 270 | — | 10.9 | 53% | 5.9 | 1.8 |
| Maidenhead United | Enterprise National League | 170 | 216 | — | 9.4 | 43% | 4.9 | 2 |
| Gateshead | Enterprise National League | 149 | 229 | — | 12.3 | 55% | 5.4 | 1.9 |
| Carlisle United | Enterprise National League | 38 | 69 | — | 13.9 | 49% | 6 | 1.9 |
| Fylde | Enterprise National League | 91 | 122 | — | 10.9 | 48% | 4.7 | 2.3 |
| Dagenham & Redbridge | Enterprise National League | 174 | 252 | — | 11.1 | 49% | 5 | 1.8 |
| Woking | Enterprise National League | 213 | 252 | — | 9.7 | 50% | 4.9 | 2.2 |
| Dover Athletic | Enterprise National League | 58 | 48 | — | 7.3 | 45% | 3.9 | 2.1 |
| Halifax Town | Enterprise National League | 212 | 282 | — | 10.3 | 49% | 4.8 | 1.8 |
| Oxford City | Enterprise National League | 46 | 54 | — | 8.7 | 48% | 3.5 | 1.9 |
| Morecambe | Enterprise National League | 38 | 55 | — | 11.4 | 51% | 4.2 | 2.3 |
| Kidderminster Harriers | Enterprise National League | 46 | 40 | — | 12 | 46% | 5.3 | 2 |
| Brackley Town | Enterprise National League | 37 | 35 | — | 9.8 | 42% | 5.5 | 2.3 |
| Braintree Town | Enterprise National League | 88 | 85 | — | 10.4 | 47% | 5.2 | 2.4 |
| Solihull Moors | Enterprise National League | 227 | 353 | — | 10.5 | 50% | 4.6 | 1.9 |
| Altrincham | Enterprise National League | 215 | 295 | — | 11.2 | 51% | 4.8 | 1.9 |
| Weymouth | Enterprise National League | 77 | 76 | — | 7.4 | 46% | 4.2 | 1.7 |
| King's Lynn Town | Enterprise National League | 82 | 87 | — | 9.7 | 49% | 4.5 | 2 |
| Torquay United | Enterprise National League | 87 | 136 | — | 9.8 | 50% | 5.5 | 1.7 |
| Dorking Wanderers | Enterprise National League | 44 | 50 | — | 10.7 | 52% | 4.8 | 2.4 |
| York City | Enterprise National League | 142 | 260 | — | 12.2 | 56% | 5.1 | 1.8 |