Aggregated team performance data including expected goals, shots, possession, corners, and discipline stats.
| Team | League | MP | Goals | Avg xG | Shots/G | Poss% | Corners/G | Cards/G |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Puerto Rico | WC Qualification Concacaf | 8 | 18 | — | 11.5 | 51% | 4.2 | 1.1 |
| United States | WC Qualification Concacaf | 14 | 21 | — | 12.7 | 56% | 5.5 |
Expected Goals (xG) is the single most important advanced metric in modern football analytics. It measures the quality of scoring chances by assigning each shot a probability of being scored, based on factors like distance, angle, assist type, and whether it was a header. A penalty is worth about 0.76 xG, while a long-range shot might be just 0.03.
The Avg xG column shows how many goals a team is expected to score per match based on their shot quality. Teams with high xG but lower actual goals are likely due a positive regression — they are creating chances but not converting them yet. The reverse (low xG, high goals) suggests a team overperforming that may regress. Read our detailed xG explainer for a deeper dive.
Shots per game indicates offensive intent — teams averaging 15+ shots are creating volume. But shots alone do not tell you about quality, which is why xG is the more reliable predictor. A team with 10 shots and 1.8 xG is more dangerous than one with 16 shots and 1.2 xG.
Possession (highlighted green above 55%) reflects control but not necessarily dominance. Some of Europe's best counter-attacking teams thrive on low possession. For betting, possession is most useful in predicting corner counts (high-possession teams win more) and tempo (high-possession games tend to be lower scoring).
The Cards/G column tracks total cards per match per team. This is useful for the cards/bookings market, which some bookmakers offer as over/under on total cards or total booking points. Teams with aggressive pressing styles or those frequently defending deep tend to commit more fouls and receive more cards. Cross-reference with form — teams on losing streaks often accumulate more cards from frustrated tackles. Check our corner data alongside cards, as set-piece-heavy teams with high card counts create chaotic matches ideal for Over bets.
| 1.1 |
| Canada | WC Qualification Concacaf | 20 | 54 | — | 11.5 | 50% | 7.1 | 1.6 |
| Honduras | WC Qualification Concacaf | 24 | 18 | — | 16.5 | 53% | 6 | 1.5 |
| Mexico | WC Qualification Concacaf | 14 | 17 | — | 16.6 | 62% | 6 | 1.8 |
| Costa Rica | WC Qualification Concacaf | 24 | 24 | — | 12.8 | 45% | 5.2 | 1.4 |
| Guatemala | WC Qualification Concacaf | 14 | 24 | — | 15.8 | 49% | 6.8 | 1.2 |
| Trinidad and Tobago | WC Qualification Concacaf | 14 | 13 | — | 17.6 | 51% | 5.6 | 1.6 |
| Panama | WC Qualification Concacaf | 30 | 31 | — | 13.6 | 57% | 5.7 | 1.2 |
| El Salvador | WC Qualification Concacaf | 30 | 32 | — | 10.6 | 51% | 5.1 | 1.9 |
| Jamaica | WC Qualification Concacaf | 24 | 22 | — | 11.1 | 48% | 4 | 2 |
| Haiti | WC Qualification Concacaf | 15 | 21 | — | 16.2 | 57% | 5.7 | 1.5 |
| Cuba | WC Qualification Concacaf | 8 | 11 | — | 14 | 56% | 5.8 | 1.1 |
| Bermuda | WC Qualification Concacaf | 14 | 11 | — | 8 | 45% | 2.8 | 1.4 |
| Barbados | WC Qualification Concacaf | 8 | 4 | — | 9.8 | 34% | 4.4 | 2 |
| Antigua and Barbuda | WC Qualification Concacaf | 8 | 7 | — | 7.5 | 34% | 3.8 | 1 |
| St. Vincent and the Grenadines | WC Qualification Concacaf | 8 | 5 | — | 7.3 | 43% | 4.8 | 0.8 |
| Guyana | WC Qualification Concacaf | 8 | 7 | — | 16 | 51% | 4.6 | 1.4 |
| Dominica | WC Qualification Concacaf | 8 | 7 | — | 7.4 | 32% | 2 | 0.9 |
| St. Kitts and Nevis | WC Qualification Concacaf | 9 | 5 | — | 14 | 36% | 4.4 | 1.3 |
| Grenada | WC Qualification Concacaf | 8 | 2 | — | 12 | 54% | 3.3 | 0.8 |
| Belize | WC Qualification Concacaf | 7 | 6 | — | 7 | 41% | 2.7 | 1.7 |
| St. Lucia | WC Qualification Concacaf | 4 | 3 | — | 10.5 | 45% | 4.3 | 1.3 |
| Curacao | WC Qualification Concacaf | 16 | 21 | — | 16.3 | 56% | 4.4 | 1.1 |
| Suriname | WC Qualification Concacaf | 14 | 25 | — | 12.5 | 52% | 5.8 | 1.4 |
| Dominican Republic | WC Qualification Concacaf | 8 | 12 | — | 22 | 40% | 6 | 1.3 |
| Cayman Islands | WC Qualification Concacaf | 8 | 3 | — | 3.7 | 30% | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| British Virgin Islands | WC Qualification Concacaf | 10 | 0 | — | 5.6 | 30% | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| Anguilla | WC Qualification Concacaf | 10 | 13 | — | 1.5 | 34% | 2.4 | 0.8 |
| Nicaragua | WC Qualification Concacaf | 13 | 19 | — | 12 | 52% | 4.6 | 1.8 |
| US Virgin Islands | WC Qualification Concacaf | 6 | 0 | — | — | — | 1 | 0.7 |
| Aruba | WC Qualification Concacaf | 8 | 5 | — | 7.8 | 44% | 1.3 | 1.1 |
| Turks and Caicos Islands | WC Qualification Concacaf | 5 | 0 | — | — | — | 0 | 1.6 |
| Montserrat | WC Qualification Concacaf | 8 | 11 | — | 8.2 | 40% | 3 | 1.4 |
| Bahamas | WC Qualification Concacaf | 7 | 1 | — | 3.8 | 30% | 1 | 1.1 |