Aggregated team performance data including expected goals, shots, possession, corners, and discipline stats.
| Team | League | MP | Goals | Avg xG | Shots/G | Poss% | Corners/G | Cards/G |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hapoel Be'er Sheva | Ligat ha'Al | 40 | 90 | — | 17.7 | 61% | 5.9 | 2.3 |
| Maccabi Haifa | Ligat ha'Al | 41 | 73 | — | 14.5 | 54% | 5.1 | 2.3 |
Expected Goals (xG) is the single most important advanced metric in modern football analytics. It measures the quality of scoring chances by assigning each shot a probability of being scored, based on factors like distance, angle, assist type, and whether it was a header. A penalty is worth about 0.76 xG, while a long-range shot might be just 0.03.
The Avg xG column shows how many goals a team is expected to score per match based on their shot quality. Teams with high xG but lower actual goals are likely due a positive regression — they are creating chances but not converting them yet. The reverse (low xG, high goals) suggests a team overperforming that may regress. Read our detailed xG explainer for a deeper dive.
Shots per game indicates offensive intent — teams averaging 15+ shots are creating volume. But shots alone do not tell you about quality, which is why xG is the more reliable predictor. A team with 10 shots and 1.8 xG is more dangerous than one with 16 shots and 1.2 xG.
Possession (highlighted green above 55%) reflects control but not necessarily dominance. Some of Europe's best counter-attacking teams thrive on low possession. For betting, possession is most useful in predicting corner counts (high-possession teams win more) and tempo (high-possession games tend to be lower scoring).
The Cards/G column tracks total cards per match per team. This is useful for the cards/bookings market, which some bookmakers offer as over/under on total cards or total booking points. Teams with aggressive pressing styles or those frequently defending deep tend to commit more fouls and receive more cards. Cross-reference with form — teams on losing streaks often accumulate more cards from frustrated tackles. Check our corner data alongside cards, as set-piece-heavy teams with high card counts create chaotic matches ideal for Over bets.
| Beitar Jerusalem | Ligat ha'Al | 41 | 80 | — | 15.4 | 60% | 5.7 | 2.7 |
| Hapoel Haifa | Ligat ha'Al | 37 | 46 | — | 12.3 | 44% | 4.3 | 2.6 |
| Maccabi Tel Aviv | Ligat ha'Al | 40 | 87 | — | 15.6 | 55% | 5.6 | 2.5 |
| Hapoel Jerusalem | Ligat ha'Al | 35 | 33 | — | 11.2 | 42% | 3.7 | 2.1 |
| Maccabi Netanya | Ligat ha'Al | 37 | 66 | — | 14.1 | 50% | 4.3 | 2.6 |
| Ashdod | Ligat ha'Al | 35 | 43 | — | 12.7 | 48% | 4.1 | 3 |
| Ironi Tiberias | Ligat ha'Al | 35 | 46 | — | 11.3 | 45% | 3.5 | 2.9 |
| Hapoel Petah Tikva | Ligat ha'Al | 36 | 48 | — | 10.7 | 51% | 4.9 | 2.4 |
| Ironi Kiryat Shmona | Ligat ha'Al | 35 | 52 | — | 12.9 | 49% | 3.8 | 3.1 |
| Hapoel Tel Aviv | Ligat ha'Al | 36 | 55 | — | 13.5 | 49% | 5.2 | 2.6 |
| Bnei Sakhnin | Ligat ha'Al | 35 | 29 | — | 8.5 | 43% | 3.1 | 2.5 |
| Maccabi Bnei Raina | Ligat ha'Al | 35 | 28 | — | 9.8 | 45% | 4.1 | 3.1 |