Aggregated team performance data including expected goals, shots, possession, corners, and discipline stats.
| Team | League | MP | Goals | Avg xG | Shots/G | Poss% | Corners/G | Cards/G |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Olympique Marseille | Coupe de France | 4 | 20 | — | 16 | 65% | 5.8 | 1.8 |
| Olympique Lyonnais | Coupe de France | 4 | 6 | — | 16.3 | 61% | 8.5 | 1.5 |
Expected Goals (xG) is the single most important advanced metric in modern football analytics. It measures the quality of scoring chances by assigning each shot a probability of being scored, based on factors like distance, angle, assist type, and whether it was a header. A penalty is worth about 0.76 xG, while a long-range shot might be just 0.03.
The Avg xG column shows how many goals a team is expected to score per match based on their shot quality. Teams with high xG but lower actual goals are likely due a positive regression — they are creating chances but not converting them yet. The reverse (low xG, high goals) suggests a team overperforming that may regress. Read our detailed xG explainer for a deeper dive.
Shots per game indicates offensive intent — teams averaging 15+ shots are creating volume. But shots alone do not tell you about quality, which is why xG is the more reliable predictor. A team with 10 shots and 1.8 xG is more dangerous than one with 16 shots and 1.2 xG.
Possession (highlighted green above 55%) reflects control but not necessarily dominance. Some of Europe's best counter-attacking teams thrive on low possession. For betting, possession is most useful in predicting corner counts (high-possession teams win more) and tempo (high-possession games tend to be lower scoring).
The Cards/G column tracks total cards per match per team. This is useful for the cards/bookings market, which some bookmakers offer as over/under on total cards or total booking points. Teams with aggressive pressing styles or those frequently defending deep tend to commit more fouls and receive more cards. Cross-reference with form — teams on losing streaks often accumulate more cards from frustrated tackles. Check our corner data alongside cards, as set-piece-heavy teams with high card counts create chaotic matches ideal for Over bets.
| Lens | Coupe de France | 6 | 19 | — | 17.7 | 58% | 7.7 | 1.7 |
| Toulouse | Coupe de France | 5 | 7 | — | 14.2 | 48% | 5.4 | 2.4 |
| Bastia | Coupe de France | 3 | 1 | — | 6.3 | 54% | 3.7 | 4.7 |
| Nice | Coupe de France | 6 | 9 | — | 12.3 | 50% | 7.3 | 1.8 |
| Montpellier | Coupe de France | 5 | 11 | — | 10.5 | 50% | 5.8 | 1.8 |
| Paris Saint Germain | Coupe de France | 3 | 7 | — | 19 | 74% | 8 | 0.7 |
| Rennes | Coupe de France | 3 | 6 | — | 25.7 | 62% | 9.7 | 1.7 |
| Strasbourg | Coupe de France | 5 | 13 | — | 17.6 | 56% | 3.8 | 1.4 |
| Feignies-Aulnoye | Coupe de France | 3 | 7 | — | 6 | 35% | 2.5 | 1.3 |
| Amiens SC | Coupe de France | 4 | 10 | — | 6 | 43% | 3 | 1 |
| Orléans | Coupe de France | 4 | 9 | — | 16.3 | 57% | 6 | 1.5 |
| Reims | Coupe de France | 7 | 14 | — | 10.7 | 53% | 2.4 | 0.7 |
| Laval | Coupe de France | 4 | 9 | — | 7.7 | 38% | 3.8 | 2.5 |
| Grenoble Foot 38 | Coupe de France | 3 | 6 | — | 9.3 | 58% | 6.7 | 1 |
| Dunkerque | Coupe de France | 3 | 8 | — | 17 | 52% | 4 | 0.3 |
| Bourg-en-Bresse | Coupe de France | 3 | 3 | — | 12.5 | 45% | 2 | 1.7 |
| Sochaux | Coupe de France | 4 | 12 | — | 13.3 | 55% | 4 | 2 |
| Guingamp | Coupe de France | 3 | 6 | — | 15.7 | 55% | 5 | 0.7 |
| Nancy | Coupe de France | 3 | 5 | — | 14.7 | 47% | 5.7 | 2 |
| Bordeaux | Coupe de France | 3 | 0 | — | 15.7 | 57% | 6.7 | 3 |
| Biesheim | Coupe de France | 3 | 4 | — | 10.7 | 48% | 5.7 | 1 |
| Paris | Coupe de France | 3 | 4 | — | 11.7 | 53% | 4 | 2.3 |
| Monaco | Coupe de France | 3 | 6 | — | 13 | 51% | 3 | 3.7 |
| Istres | Coupe de France | 3 | 2 | — | 10.7 | 59% | 5.7 | 1.7 |
| Le Puy-en-Velay | Coupe de France | 4 | 3 | — | 7.3 | 50% | 4.3 | 2 |
| Avranches | Coupe de France | 4 | 2 | — | 9.8 | 44% | 3.8 | 1.8 |
| Troyes | Coupe de France | 5 | 9 | — | 11.3 | 46% | 4 | 1 |
| Dieppe | Coupe de France | 3 | 5 | — | 15 | 45% | 6 | 1 |
| Croix Football IC | Coupe de France | 3 | 2 | — | 8 | 41% | 5 | 1 |
| Raon l'Etape | Coupe de France | 3 | 5 | — | 4 | 22% | 2 | 0.7 |
| Hauts Lyonnais | Coupe de France | 4 | 4 | — | 15.3 | 51% | 5.8 | 3 |
| Le Mans | Coupe de France | 5 | 5 | — | 8.6 | 62% | 5.8 | 2 |
| Lorient | Coupe de France | 4 | 12 | — | 18 | 57% | 4.5 | 2.3 |
| Les Herbiers | Coupe de France | 3 | 5 | — | 8.7 | 49% | 2 | 3 |
| Blois | Coupe de France | 3 | 4 | — | 11 | 44% | 8 | 2.7 |
| Bassin d' Arcachon Sud | Coupe de France | 3 | 4 | — | 9.3 | 47% | 5 | 2.3 |
| Olympique Marcquois | Coupe de France | 3 | 8 | — | 13 | 47% | 5 | 0.3 |
| Bayeux | Coupe de France | 3 | 3 | — | 9 | 29% | 5 | 1 |
| Perigny | Coupe de France | 3 | 4 | — | 4 | 38% | 3 | 0.3 |
| SA Merignac | Coupe de France | 3 | 1 | — | 8.7 | 38% | 4 | 1.3 |
| Freyming | Coupe de France | 3 | 1 | — | 7 | 42% | 3 | 0 |
| Montreuil FC | Coupe de France | 3 | 5 | — | 8 | 53% | 4 | 4.3 |